Asus H110M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-C (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160919
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '21 at 08:32
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 106 2-Core 211 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 368 47% 357 Pts	64-Core 418 26% 418 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 153,031 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	3.28% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 7.2 Parallax 7.1 5% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.28% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SP600 128GB 8,600 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6.8E SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 139 146 146 104 59 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 355 Write 148 Mixed 180 SusWrite 123 44% 201 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 37.6 138% 54.4 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 110 107% 173 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 92%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 129 132 133 135 132 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Read 100 Write 101 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 132 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 84%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 13GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 41 42 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	Read 40.3 Write 37.8 Mixed 27.3 SusWrite 41.1 49% 36.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GB 26,065 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	77.9% Very good	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 31.1 MC Mixed 23.3 80% 28 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 26 SC Mixed 23.7 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-C Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	176x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	146x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	116x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	98x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	90x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	68x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	41x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	30x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	18x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	18x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $166

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16