Asus N73SV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus N73SV (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N73SV
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110818
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '17 at 15:20
Run Duration	281 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 77.5 2-Core 145 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 372 38% 310 Pts	64-Core 375 23% 375 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 15E2) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.89% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 1.38 2% 2.19 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.83 2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60 23,997 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: JE3OA60A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 184 184 73014444033 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 4114 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 7546 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3889 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 41 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 87320 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 210453987357 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	33.6% Below average	Read 61.4 Write 55.8 Mixed 50.9 42% 56 MB/s	4K Read 0.22 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.14 42% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 50%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60 23,997 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 64GB free Firmware: JE3OA60A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 176 176 73014444033 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 10396 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 7368 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3877 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 14 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 80 80 203035 (C2) HDA temperature 240 240 206159085593 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	24% Poor	Read 41.5 Write 41.8 Mixed 38.9 31% 40.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.06 4K Mixed 0.17 59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 50%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 3,868 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 2TB free, PID a202 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 96.8 Write 95.1 Mixed 23.3 85% 71.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.17 69% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 53%
ST1000DM 003-9YN162 1TB 242 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 717GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 27.9 Write 23.9 Mixed 8.07 23% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 0.49 4K Mixed 0.28 30% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 68%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 26GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 127 Write 57.8 Mixed 55.4 88% 80 MB/s	4K Read 5.39 4K Write 0.32 4K Mixed 0.26 40% 1.99 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GB 3,512 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	46.6% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14.7 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 14.2 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 79.1 51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N73SV Builds (Compare 176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N73SV

CPU
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	97x
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	52x
Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples	10x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	123x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	48x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 45%, 3,512 samples	8x
ASU1333S9-4G-ECEWG 06C1 SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 6GBKingstonBench 41%, 60 samples	6x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 3x4GBSamsungBench 37%, 85 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16