Asrock FM2A75 Pro4+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75 Pro4+  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '21 at 14:48
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 57%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 740K
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 57.1
2-Core 109
51% 81.1 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 184
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.7% Average
Lighting 55.1
Reflection 54.9
Parallax 49
45% 53 fps
MRender 42.4
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 46.4
38% 46.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 240GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 282 350 366 374 354 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 437
Write 373
Mixed 304
SusWrite 326
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 6.5
47% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 36
56% 105 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 91%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
287GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 303 364 361 355 365 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 385
Write 283
Mixed 348
SusWrite 336
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 29.2
105% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 250
187% 250 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32
288GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 149 161 162 161 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 133
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 156
101% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.4% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75 Pro4+ Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback