HP 23-g205br

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 23-g205br  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B21
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141017
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateJan 26 '21 at 12:46
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 161
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 353
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 2B21) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 7.1
3% 5.07 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 480GB
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200Sc10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 395 395 379 388 393 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 426
Write 330
Mixed 313
SusWrite 390
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 29.4
121% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 181
168% 256 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-155.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 14.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 14
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback