MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 21 days ago, 6 days ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C09
Motherboard	MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200609
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '21 at 07:05
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$94 64,375 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 77.1 1-Core 102 2-Core 198 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 393 46% 349 Pts	64-Core 393 26% 393 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 331,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Asus(1043 852C) 2GB CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.6% Below average	Lighting 42.8 Reflection 46.2 Parallax 40.7 35% 43.2 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 40.6 Splatting 35.8 32% 38 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 37%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB 2,524 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0311R SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 126 128 126 128 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Read 476 Write 355 Mixed 356 SusWrite 149 74% 334 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 76.4 4K Mixed 37.8 131% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 89.2 127% 233 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$40 754,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 493GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 104 101 106 99 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 100 Write 108 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 105 69% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown R748G2606U2S 2x8GB 378 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	62.9% Good	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 20.4 65% 22.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 16.6 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 86.1 46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 5,605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $94Bench 80%, 64,375 samples	2,179x
Core i5-9400FIntel $142Bench 86%, 189,160 samples	1,762x
Core i3-8100Intel $124Bench 77%, 81,869 samples	215x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 97,017 samples	503x
RX 570AMD $125Bench 47%, 305,321 samples	468x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $304Bench 60%, 81,849 samples	370x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $32Bench 66%, 251,096 samples	474x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 46%, 104,751 samples	240x
A400 480GBKingston $53Bench 75%, 126,750 samples	219x

RAM
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 22,908 samples	232x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $81Bench 81%, 97,262 samples	165x
1x8GBUnknownBench 32%, 129,356 samples	163x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $281

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-10400F $143	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-10600K $224	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $326	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16