MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C09
Motherboard	MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200609
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '21 at 07:05
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 77.1 1-Core 108 2-Core 212 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 431 52% 399 Pts	64-Core 451 28% 451 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 852C) 2GB CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	33.5% Below average	Lighting 42.8 Reflection 46.2 Parallax 40.7 35% 43.2 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 40.6 Splatting 35.8 31% 38 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB 4,995 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0311R SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 126 128 126 128 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Read 476 Write 355 Mixed 356 SusWrite 149 74% 334 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 76.4 4K Mixed 37.8 131% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 89.2 127% 233 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 493GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 104 101 106 99 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 100 Write 108 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 105 69% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown R748G2606U2S 2x8GB 661 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	62.9% Good	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 20.4 65% 22.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 16.6 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 86.1 46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 6,340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $101Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	2,311x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,500x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	291x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	635x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	462x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	356x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	454x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	282x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	206x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	203x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	164x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	155x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $359

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16