Intel CRESCENTBAY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardIntel CRESCENTBAY  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150829
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 25 '21 at 06:52
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5550U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 97
2-Core 183
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 248
33% 249 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile)
Intel(8086 1626) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.83% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 12.1
7% 7.83 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 8.5
7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.83%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTE256HMHP-000MV 256GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT41M0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 119 137 155 136 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 378
Write 129
Mixed 126
SusWrite 135
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 23.5
98% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 63.9
95% 182 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 80%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 35
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 17.7
37% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 55%
Apricorn SATAWire 120GB
25GB free, PID 0040
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 34.8
Write 35.3
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 17.5
41% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 12.5
1,012% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 14.2
DQ Write 22
DQ Mixed 16.5
1,362% 17.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DH0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CRESCENTBAY Builds (Compare 192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel CRESCENTBAY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback