Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	65.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DV
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200922
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '21 at 21:38
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	46.9% Average	Memory 54.1 1-Core 96.4 2-Core 173 60% 108 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 410 37% 312 Pts	64-Core 438 27% 438 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 67%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile) 119,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 140F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	65.7% Good	Lighting 77.2 Reflection 87.3 Parallax 80.9 63% 81.8 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 76.3 Splatting 75.8 71% 89 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 83%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.10.30.02 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.66% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 9.8 Parallax 20.6 0% 10.2 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 21 Splatting 13.4 11% 12.6 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 3.66% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 76 31 8.8 73 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 1,027 Write 806 Mixed 739 SusWrite 107 149% 670 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 52.8 192% 69.6 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 638 DQ Mixed 222 243% 397 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 209%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 132 137 137 136 135 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 83.7 Write 122 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 133 73% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 76.D305G.D390B 1x16GB 6,956 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 10.8 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 10.2 28% 9.8 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	623x
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	73x

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	377x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	278x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	41x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	375x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	124x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	63x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 76%, 20,226 samples	206x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	129x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	79x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16