Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-1xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8767
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201111
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '21 at 20:25
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400-$117 71,804 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Memory 91.9 1-Core 131 2-Core 261 90% 161 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 826 80% 657 Pts	64-Core 1,058 66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 22,284 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 879B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.8% Average	Lighting 60.2 Reflection 60.2 Parallax 52.2 49% 57.5 fps	MRender 62.8 Gravity 52.2 Splatting 52.6 45% 55.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 331GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 819 665 657 657 648 644 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	188% Outstanding	Read 725 Write 2,287 Mixed 787 SusWrite 682 255% 1,120 MB/s	4K Read 56.9 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 73 240% 81.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,043 DQ Write 855 DQ Mixed 955 714% 951 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 188% Great: 340%
Asmt USB 3.0 Destop H 2TB 250 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 144 145 144 145 144 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 139 Write 140 Mixed 89.4 SusWrite 144 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 110%
Asmt USB 3.0 Destop H 1TB 351 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 931GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 183 186 186 186 187 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 184 Mixed 35.6 SusWrite 186 107% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 3200 2x8GB 16,423 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	84.5% Excellent	MC Read 33 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 23.6 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 36.2 SC Mixed 25.5 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples	264x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	101x
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	76x

SSD
KIOXIA 256GBKbg40znv256gBench 138%, 13,541 samples	78x
hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0A 256GBSKBench 146%, 8,367 samples	72x
MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 114%, 12,950 samples	36x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	38x
4ATF1G64AZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 1,124 samples	34x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-XN 1x8GBHynixBench 50%, 1,261 samples	33x

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $117

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16