Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '21 at 14:42
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 142
60% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 436
42% 344 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
PNY(196E 0974) 2GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.29% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 11.7
8% 11 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 12
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.29%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 269 302 302 270 276 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 454
Mixed 445
SusWrite 300
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 49.1
161% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 68.9
105% 198 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 100%
Great: 129%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 165GB-$46
58GB free
Firmware: P22OA50U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 55.9
Write 26.9
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 29
26% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 39%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 216 219 218 218 217 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 118%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 101 102 100 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 84.3
Write 79.6
Mixed 65
SusWrite 101
113% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 49%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 128 128 126 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 136
Write 147
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 126
171% 127 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.4
227% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 98%
WD easystore 25FB 12TB
4TB free, PID 25fb
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 157 158 159 159 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 140
Write 144
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 158
179% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 1.4
271% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.M16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.3% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 17.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback