PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EP43T-USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100107 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Jun 05 '17 at 08:42 |
Run Duration | 98 Seconds |
Run User | HKG-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5450-$299
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
60.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Nvidia(10DE 104B) 3GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 382.33
|
48.2%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
40.1%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 28x |
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 7x |
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples | 5x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $250 |