Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2130-$50 6,759 User benchmarks, average bench 57% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 90 2-Core 175 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 228 31% 228 Pts	64-Core 228 14% 228 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11B9) 1.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.92% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.93 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.92% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 120GB 2,135 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: AP613PE0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 139 59 52 49 52 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.3% Below average	Read 184 Write 167 Mixed 144 SusWrite 104 34% 150 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 20.6 78% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 25.6 DQ Write 48.1 DQ Mixed 28.2 24% 34 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KTW149-ELD Samsung M378B2873EH1-CF8 Samsung M391B2873EH1-CF8 3GB 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz 1024, 1024, 1024 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.4% Below average	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 8.6 27% 9.57 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 8.7 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	54x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	22x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	18x

RAM
M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 43%, 88 samples	9x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 PSD34G1600L81 PSD34G1600L81 12GBSamsungBench 37%, 7 samples	5x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	5x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $281

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16