Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200512
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '21 at 15:02
Run Duration	282 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 74.1 1-Core 127 2-Core 246 81% 149 Pts	4-Core 475 8-Core 952 84% 714 Pts	64-Core 1,295 80% 1,295 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gainward(10B0 1C03) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.7% Above average	Lighting 68.7 Reflection 73 Parallax 66.9 56% 69.5 fps	MRender 66.7 Gravity 69.4 Splatting 66.3 55% 67.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 651 416 416 408 406 409 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	240% Outstanding	Read 2,466 Write 2,218 Mixed 1,551 SusWrite 451 372% 1,672 MB/s	4K Read 58.4 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 76.9 254% 87.5 MB/s	DQ Read 950 DQ Write 609 DQ Mixed 854 617% 804 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 240% Great: 302%
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 112GB free Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 136 137 137 137 137 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	79.4% Very good	Read 455 Write 282 Mixed 336 SusWrite 164 69% 309 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 76.2 4K Mixed 37.5 136% 48.4 MB/s	DQ Read 232 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 156 130% 190 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 85%
Sandisk PLUS 120GB 16,974 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 41GB free Firmware: UE45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 11 8.2 124 64 78 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 474 Write 262 Mixed 253 SusWrite 77.7 59% 267 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 19.4 78% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 80.6 DQ Mixed 42.6 47% 80.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 55%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 392GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 451 458 460 459 302 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 452 Mixed 445 SusWrite 424 103% 456 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 84 4K Mixed 51.6 171% 58.4 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 202 153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 129%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 109GB free Firmware: Z331 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 86 86 86 83 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 378 Write 388 Mixed 368 SusWrite 97.2 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 77.7 4K Mixed 21.4 108% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 33.3 64% 129 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 78%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 191 192 191 191 191 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 175 Mixed 92 SusWrite 186 119% 163 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 149 150 149 149 150 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 157 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 149 92% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB 92,358 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 25.1 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 22.9 SC Write 28.7 SC Mixed 24.9 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 92.3 43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $475

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,916x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,341x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	1,104x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,103x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	879x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	611x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $99Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	846x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	707x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	421x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	434x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	185x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,733

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16