Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160517
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '17 at 19:27
Run Duration	452 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 101 2-Core 199 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 784 69% 588 Pts	64-Core 992 61% 992 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Zotac(19DA 0426) CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Lighting 147 Reflection 160 Parallax 159 120% 155 fps	MRender 125 Gravity 153 Splatting 117 107% 132 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175 24,007 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 11 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3629 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 705 (64) Unknown 100 100 4810752 (65) Unknown 100 100 1121280 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 294 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 729 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2775 (B7) Unknown 99 99 13 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 29 100 163209740317 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 11 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 11 (E7) Temperature 97 97 3 (E9) Unknown 100 100 8520 (EA) Unknown 100 100 5860 (F1) Unknown 100 100 7445 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5009 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 11	47.6% Average	Read 444 Write 243 Mixed 100 57% 262 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 27.6 4K Mixed 9.17 35% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 67.5 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 26.4 39% 71.9 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 92%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 148 148 34384773511 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 462 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2921 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 461 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 492 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 492 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 197569347614 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 5507	99.3% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 171 Mixed 85.7 106% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.22 93% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 108%
General UDisk 32GB 150 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 29GB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	4.16% Terrible	Read 12.9 Write 3.15 Mixed 6.28 8% 7.43 MB/s	4K Read 6.74 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.006 25% 2.25 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.16% Great: 11%
USB DISK 2.0 2GB 609 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	8.21% Terrible	Read 29.5 Write 8.78 Mixed 10.2 17% 16.1 MB/s	4K Read 8.47 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.006 32% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.21% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x8GB 7,706 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 3 of 8 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	MC Read 34.9 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 28 91% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $290

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	296x
Core i7-6950XIntel $499Bench 87%, 6,135 samples	246x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	128x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	180x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	175x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	62x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	47x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	36x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 96%, 3,140 samples	18x
Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 95%, 3,531 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $1,578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16