Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 107% UFO	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '21 at 12:44
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$200 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Memory 94.5 1-Core 167 2-Core 331 107% 198 Pts	4-Core 632 8-Core 1,042 102% 837 Pts	64-Core 1,558 96% 1,558 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	58.7% Above average	Lighting 75.3 Reflection 69.7 Parallax 101 61% 82.1 fps	MRender 68.3 Gravity 82.3 Splatting 51.2 54% 67.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Force MP600 500GB 13,280 User benchmarks, average bench 261% 220GB free (System drive) Firmware: EGFM11.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 659 469 456 412 276 490 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	167% Outstanding	Read 884 Write 1,195 Mixed 473 SusWrite 460 169% 753 MB/s	4K Read 43.4 4K Write 197 4K Mixed 53 238% 97.9 MB/s	DQ Read 954 DQ Write 494 DQ Mixed 681 517% 710 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 374%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 21GB free Firmware: DXT0AB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 249 249 190 89 62 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	74% Very good	Read 466 Write 249 Mixed 180 SusWrite 181 60% 269 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 83.4 4K Mixed 25 119% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 54.5 80% 150 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 199 193 199 201 200 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 152 Write 188 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 197 112% 154 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 208 204 216 214 203 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Read 128 Write 170 Mixed 81 SusWrite 206 107% 146 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 403GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 145 146 148 145 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 112 Write 123 Mixed 77 SusWrite 143 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 106%
WD My Book 1230 4TB 14,665 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2TB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 135 134 133 135 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 103 Write 106 Mixed 88.2 SusWrite 134 149% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 60%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB 7,568 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 147 148 146 147 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 158 Mixed 124 SusWrite 147 204% 154 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 12.3 4K Mixed 1.2 534% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 0.7 DQ Write 11 DQ Mixed 0.7 400% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB 44,547 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	99.9% Outstanding	MC Read 42 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 36.2 100% 35.1 GB/s	SC Read 32.4 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 39.8 94% 33.1 GB/s	Latency 58.5 68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $193

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $150Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	868x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	833x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	570x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	514x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	402x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $933

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16