| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20200717 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 22 '21 at 15:09 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
94.6%
Outstanding
|
89% 157 Pts
|
77% 612 Pts
|
44% 715 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.2%
Poor
|
30% 38.4 fps
|
28% 35.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KINGSTON 480GB
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 351 386 361 366 410 MB/s
|
47.8%
Average
|
46% 202 MB/s
|
49% 15.5 MB/s
|
11% 14.6 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
546GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 152 142 145 129 MB/s
|
94.7%
Outstanding
|
96% 133 MB/s
|
135% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
89.6%
Excellent
|
91% 31.8 GB/s
|
76% 26.5 GB/s
|
71% 56.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME H310M-R R2.0 Builds (Compare 4,167 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,855x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 862x |
| Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 187x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 458x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 386x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 355x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $285 |