Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion WE168AA-ABU p6325uk (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI IONA
Memory	7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100303
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '21 at 12:43
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	83%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Memory 53.3 1-Core 58.4 2-Core 110 43% 73.8 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 152 21% 156 Pts	64-Core 154 10% 154 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 848E) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.01% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 0.4 1% 0.67 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.6 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.01% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS128XBTMT3D58G 128GB 1,112 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0606BMS SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 132 34 36 31 13 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.5% Poor	Read 159 Write 157 Mixed 150 SusWrite 68.4 30% 134 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 26.1 4K Mixed 8.4 40% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 70.6 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 21.1 42% 81.8 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 9801 HP497157-C01-ELDW 9E02 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 9801 HP497157-C01-ELDW 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.1% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 12.2 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 6.1 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16