Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 10:10
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 137
61% 99 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 324
36% 285 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 21.6
17% 19.8 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 16
16% 20.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 480GB-$70
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M2CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 415 416 429 433 410 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 486
Write 430
Mixed 388
SusWrite 417
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 33.9
110% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 175
125% 159 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86%
Great: 121%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
581GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 405 404 318 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 468
Write 147
Mixed 328
SusWrite 286
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 33.1
120% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 134
108% 151 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 102%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 106 108 108 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 110
Write 99.2
Mixed 64
SusWrite 106
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX3M4X1866C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.7% Above average
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 19.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 14.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback