Performance Results


Gaming 103% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 108% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900KF 18,610 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Memory 83.7 1-Core 146 2-Core 273 94% 168 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 893 84% 676 Pts	64-Core 1,527 102% 1,527 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$510 427,308 User benchmarks, average bench 118% Gigabyte(1458 3FFC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.79 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	119% Outstanding	Lighting 154 Reflection 152 Parallax 152 125% 152 fps	MRender 188 Gravity 132 Splatting 117 113% 145 fps
Poor: 107% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 128%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 110,083 User benchmarks, average bench 161% 430GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 793 838 231 61 57 58 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	157% Outstanding	Read 1,272 Write 891 Mixed 845 SusWrite 339 186% 837 MB/s	4K Read 48.2 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 58.1 201% 69.1 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 725 DQ Mixed 224 258% 428 MB/s
Poor: 107% ↑ This bench: 157% Great: 212%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$110 404,139 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 931GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 438 448 442 440 436 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 446 Mixed 425 SusWrite 439 102% 451 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 84.4 4K Mixed 38.7 135% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 352 264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$137 214,902 User benchmarks, average bench 307% 714GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1650 1747 1561 1155 1151 1148 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	303% Outstanding	Read 2382 Write 2,195 Mixed 1,552 SusWrite 1402 422% 1,883 MB/s	4K Read 55.2 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 72.1 241% 83.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,340 DQ Write 791 DQ Mixed 1,034 778% 1,055 MB/s
Poor: 235% ↑ This bench: 303% Great: 354%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$140 18,045 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 21.8 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 29.4 SC Mixed 22.2 66% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 94%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 100%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $450Bench 106%, 343,764 samples	128x
RTX 2060Nvidia $338Bench 89%, 371,694 samples	125x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 118%, 427,308 samples	121x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $80Bench 286%, 264,269 samples	134x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $60Bench 106%, 503,065 samples	66x
P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $105Bench 233%, 100,808 samples	44x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $79Bench 85%, 377,583 samples	73x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $73Bench 81%, 479,768 samples	66x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 87%, 141,276 samples	61x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $809

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16