Asus ROG STRIX TRX40-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX TRX40-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 09:25
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 3960X-$1,350
sTRX4, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 69.3
1-Core 156
2-Core 310
94% 179 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 1,172
97% 843 Pts
64-Core 4,376
271% 4,376 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (119 fps cap detected)
96.6% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 119
Parallax 119
96% 119 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 119
Splatting 117
97% 119 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 886 649 622 593 560 573 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 2,107
Write 1,550
Mixed 679
SusWrite 647
276% 1,246 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 55.4
186% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,134
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 215
262% 490 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 209%
Great: 254%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
880GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1339 1302 1334 1286 1272 1324 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,438
Write 1,423
Mixed 1038
SusWrite 1,309
293% 1,302 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 57
192% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 636
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 208
194% 317 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 214%
Great: 255%
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
805GB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1821 1757 1758 1796 1735 1722 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,448
Write 1,865
Mixed 1265
SusWrite 1,765
359% 1,586 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 50
164% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 756
DQ Write 90
DQ Mixed 180
193% 342 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 236%
Great: 305%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
142GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 272 284 273 262 269 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 496
Write 426
Mixed 347
SusWrite 285
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 38.4
131% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 60.9
DQ Mixed 122
94% 132 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84%
Great: 118%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 133 141 135 139 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239
971GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 220 216 228 219 223 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
151% Outstanding
MC Read 59.7
MC Write 63.3
MC Mixed 59.9
174% 61 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 30.9
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 151%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX TRX40-E GAMING Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 210%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX TRX40-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,881
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback