OEM A320V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardOEM A320V  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 08:42
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$146
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 183
64% 113 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 328
42% 311 Pts
64-Core 351
24% 351 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.8 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 65 59 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 375
Write 74.2
Mixed 105
SusWrite 63.1
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 21.2
95% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 64.7
DQ Mixed 81.7
74% 117 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.4
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical A320V Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: OEM A320V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $230Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-10400F $151Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $327Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback