Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 07:59
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$258
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 714
73% 590 Pts
64-Core 813
50% 813 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 89%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 144
Parallax 132
98% 132 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 134
Splatting 120
100% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 432 300 62 52 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 380
Mixed 394
SusWrite 205
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 51.6
171% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 255
217% 317 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
110GB free
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 135 134 134 134 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 402
Mixed 362
SusWrite 156
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 48.3
175% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 168
177% 291 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 108%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
931GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 440 468 479 483 480 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 469
Mixed 408
SusWrite 449
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 44.6
160% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 353
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 112%
Great: 121%
Sabrent Dual SATA Bridge 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 21 23 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 18.9
Write 16.5
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 23.5
14% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
51% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 69%
Sabrent Dual SATA Bridge 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.9 5.6 5.9 6.7 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.6% Terrible
Read 9.9
Write 9.7
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 6.1
6% 8.72 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 4.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 DDR4 2666 2OZ DDR4 3000 DDR4 2666 2OZ 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 30.3
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 26.5
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 15,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $1,082
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback