| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Turbo-x X570 GAMING X (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte X570 GAMING X |
| Memory | 15.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191206 |
| Uptime | 7.6 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 22 '21 at 07:19 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
84.3%
Excellent
|
93% 177 Pts
|
91% 759 Pts
|
89% 1,444 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
100%
Outstanding
|
98% 127 fps
|
105% 130 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WDS100T3XHC-00SJG0 1TB
643GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1240 1295 1205 1161 1257 1268 MB/s
|
274%
Outstanding
|
396% 1,763 MB/s
|
220% 81.4 MB/s
|
823% 1,110 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
411GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 102 103 102 103 MB/s
|
56.2%
Above average
|
63% 85.4 MB/s
|
178% 1.17 MB/s
| |
|
USB Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
|
8.53%
Terrible
|
26% 19.4 MB/s
|
19% 1.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3466C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
65.8%
Good
|
67% 23.5 GB/s
|
60% 21.1 GB/s
|
38% 104 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 7 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Turbo-x X570 GAMING X
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples | 4x |
| Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples | 2x |
| Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 4x |
| RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples | 2x |
| RTX 3070-TiNvidia $499Bench 158%, 218,061 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 98% - Outstanding | Total price: $488 |