PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T3610 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T3610 (all builds) |
Memory | 24 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170509 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 21 '21 at 19:46 |
Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
66.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 285-$189
CLim: 965 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
32.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 356 331 324 308 315 MB/s
|
79.5%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
89.6%
Excellent
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples | 942x |
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 560x |
Xeon E5-1607 v2IntelBench 65%, 1,768 samples | 246x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 236x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 217x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 93x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $373 |