| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P7H55-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.9 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110425 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 21 '21 at 18:05 |
| Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 44% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.3%
Above average
|
56% 90.6 Pts
|
25% 191 Pts
|
13% 204 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
Asus(1043 845B) 2GB
CLim: 1261 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
|
16.4%
Very poor
|
15% 21.4 fps
|
19% 23.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 178 66 109 120 123 MB/s
|
38.1%
Below average
|
39% 173 MB/s
|
66% 23.2 MB/s
|
27% 45.4 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
|
29.5%
Poor
|
27% 9.6 GB/s
|
24% 8.23 GB/s
|
52% 76.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P7H55-M Builds (Compare 446 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 94x |
| Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples | 71x |
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 59x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 32x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 18x |
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 17x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $187 |