Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 216% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 241% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	210% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201204
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '21 at 17:15
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 91.6 1-Core 168 2-Core 337 107% 199 Pts	4-Core 638 8-Core 1,178 109% 908 Pts	64-Core 2,310 143% 2,310 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Asus(1043 87AF) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	210% Outstanding	Lighting 311 Reflection 280 Parallax 321 254% 304 fps	MRender 350 Gravity 254 Splatting 184 206% 263 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 210% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150 16,934 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 415GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 425 420 392 394 428 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	99.2% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 426 Mixed 415 SusWrite 410 97% 432 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 71.6 4K Mixed 45 148% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 200 151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 99.2% Great: 133%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 85GB free Firmware: UH5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 105 35 54 75 34 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 434 Write 262 Mixed 181 SusWrite 70.6 52% 237 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 8 55% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 48.9 DQ Mixed 29 36% 64.6 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 58%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 163 160 163 163 164 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 152 Mixed 102 SusWrite 162 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 101%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 271GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 97 97 97 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Read 134 Write 138 Mixed 64 SusWrite 96.9 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1 212% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 270GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 129 128 129 128 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Read 128 Write 154 Mixed 86.2 SusWrite 128 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.1 223% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 112%
Intenso Micro Line 16GB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9.9 9.9 9.6 9.9 10 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	5.97% Terrible	Read 22 Write 5.3 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 9.7 12% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.97% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESC.M16FE 2x16GB 2,856 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 48.5 MC Write 40.4 MC Mixed 40.7 123% 43.2 GB/s	SC Read 30.8 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 38.8 88% 30.9 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,719 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,332x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,054x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $150Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	879x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	510x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	398x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $600Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	361x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	438x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	382x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	205x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	157x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	124x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	116x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $1,208

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16