Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4 (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091203
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '21 at 17:00
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 93.6 1-Core 72.1 2-Core 130 62% 98.4 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 372 37% 300 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% MSI(1462 2840) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.9% Poor	Lighting 31 Reflection 35.8 Parallax 43.4 25% 36.7 fps	MRender 47.2 Gravity 40.2 Splatting 36 33% 41.1 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SATAIII 512GB 1,466 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 447GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0929A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 199 209 204 203 203 MB/s Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.4% Average	Read 218 Write 203 Mixed 197 SusWrite 193 46% 203 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 49.7 4K Mixed 15.9 84% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 25.2 DQ Write 72.9 DQ Mixed 20.4 24% 39.5 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 97%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 61GB free Firmware: 12.01B02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 49 49 49 49 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 50.1 Write 54.9 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 48 36% 48.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 58%
Intenso Business Line 64GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 52GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.8 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	2.93% Terrible	Read 8.3 Write 3.8 Mixed 2 SusWrite 4.9 6% 4.75 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.93% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	41.9% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12.7 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 11 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 60.8 66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55-UD4 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	22x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	21x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	8x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	5x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	5x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	7x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	3x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	13x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	11x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $475

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16