Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 193%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 191%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics183% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 16:23
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 167
2-Core 329
106% 196 Pts
4-Core 656
8-Core 1,088
106% 872 Pts
64-Core 1,628
101% 1,628 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
183% Outstanding
Lighting 262
Reflection 242
Parallax 269
213% 258 fps
MRender 303
Gravity 228
Splatting 171
184% 234 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 183%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$38
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 24 53 53 52 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,437
Write 900
Mixed 901
SusWrite 99.2
185% 834 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 59.1
265% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 2.7
DQ Mixed 4.4
46% 120 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 151%
Great: 242%
Intel 730 Series 240GB-$250
37GB free
Firmware: L2010420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 276 272 274 274 275 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 399
Write 280
Mixed 269
SusWrite 275
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 35.7
147% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 199
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 95%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
61GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 455 382 249 249 250 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 420
Write 441
Mixed 380
SusWrite 338
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 40.4
143% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 98%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
2TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 162 161 161 163 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
349GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 185 190 190 190 191 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 103
Write 74
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 187
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 114%
DISK SCSI_DISK_1234 8GB
7GB free, PID 8902
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.9 0.8 1.1 0.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
3.61% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 0.7
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 0.8
4% 4.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.61%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 34.9
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 30.2
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 37
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,746 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,493
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback