Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$260 79,875 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Memory 90.2 1-Core 97.2 2-Core 194 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 774 69% 582 Pts	64-Core 772 48% 772 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	6.21% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 9.9 Parallax 9.1 5% 8.4 fps	MRender 9.8 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 12.4 8% 10 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.21% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 842 Write 1,964 Mixed 890 279% 1,232 MB/s	4K Read 53.9 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 67.6 223% 74.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,009 DQ Write 952 DQ Mixed 1,036 762% 999 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESE.M16FE 1x16GB 805 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 15.9 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 21.7 SC Mixed 18.4 53% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 74%

Battleship

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	100x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	91x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	78x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	79x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	66x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	48x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	46x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	36x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $563

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16