Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460T 1,971 User benchmarks, average bench 59% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 74.6 1-Core 74.4 2-Core 141 58% 96.5 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 225 31% 229 Pts	64-Core 227 14% 227 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 2B43) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	2.91% Terrible	Lighting 3.2 Reflection 10 Parallax 5.4 3% 6.2 fps	MRender 6.7 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 4.2 4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.91% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SH00R480GB 480GB 1,405 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 343GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0110A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 282 4.9 146 4.9 6.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Read 476 Write 350 Mixed 9.5 SusWrite 88.6 51% 231 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.4 28% 7.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16GB 241 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.8% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 16.2 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 10.8 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 91.2 44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-4460TIntelBench 59%, 1,971 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	1x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $84Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	1x

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16