Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135 127,344 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	58% Above average	Memory 53.4 1-Core 102 2-Core 182 62% 112 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 594 56% 465 Pts	64-Core 595 37% 595 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU) 44,235 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Asus(1043 876B) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.20 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Lighting 21 Reflection 80 Parallax 29.1 17% 43.4 fps	MRender 12.3 Gravity 23.3 Splatting 14.1 13% 16.6 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB 26,886 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 443 Write 376 Mixed 338 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 69 4K Mixed 32.1 129% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 10.5 67% 157 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 94%
Seagate Basic 1TB 1,185 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 832GB free Firmware: 0712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 34 33 34 34 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 16.5 Write 27.8 Mixed 27.9 SusWrite 32.6 20% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 197% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x4GB 1,201 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	79% Very good	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 26.9 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 19.4 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 106%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

RAM
BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE 1x8GBCrucialBench 46%, 2,547 samples	20x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBTeamBench 73%, 9,275 samples	14x
2x4GBAdataBench 60%, 13,050 samples	14x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $283

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16