Performance Results


Gaming 132% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 141% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte B460MAORUSPRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte B460M AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200527
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '21 at 07:55
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900K-$442 107,269 User benchmarks, average bench 100% U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Memory 83.7 1-Core 151 2-Core 299 96% 178 Pts	4-Core 572 8-Core 1057 97% 815 Pts	64-Core 1,808 112% 1,808 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 106%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Gigabyte(1458 404E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	143% Outstanding	Lighting 207 Reflection 196 Parallax 187 169% 197 fps	MRender 186 Gravity 150 Splatting 125 123% 154 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 492 Write 475 Mixed 394 101% 453 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 98.6 4K Mixed 55.8 188% 65.5 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 347 262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 194GB free Firmware: P3CR021 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1479 506 118 121 120 120 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	215% Outstanding	Read 1,642 Write 1,580 Mixed 1,201 SusWrite 411 270% 1,209 MB/s	4K Read 59.7 4K Write 142 4K Mixed 77.9 265% 93 MB/s	DQ Read 924 DQ Write 978 DQ Mixed 314 412% 739 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 215% Great: 295%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 134 140 140 125 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 68.5 Write 112 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 129 68% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB 2,327 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	42.9% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 12.4 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 14.9 38% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 64%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 127%

UFO

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 115%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	185x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	152x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	141x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	50x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	49x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	43x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	112x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	80x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	43x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $711

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16