Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Memory 43.2 1-Core 38.8 2-Core 68.2 31% 50.1 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 148 16% 126 Pts	64-Core 254 16% 254 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) 420,154 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 506A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.64% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 0.2 Parallax 0 2% 1 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 2.9 Splatting 4.6 3% 4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.64% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LENSE30256GMSP34MEAT3TA 256GB 2,231 User benchmarks, average bench 134% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.6.0412 SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 233 236 299 282 247 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 647 Write 960 Mixed 560 SusWrite 281 138% 612 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 30.5 4K Mixed 15.5 56% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 188 133% 171 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 181%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GB 16,227 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 11.2 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 10.3 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 188 21% 188 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	5x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	5x

SSD
MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 182%, 10,890 samples	3x
LENSE30256GMSP34MEAT3TA 256GBBench 134%, 2,231 samples	2x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	4x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16