Asus TUF Gaming FX505GE_FX505GE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GE_FX505GE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GE
Memory14.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 06:06
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 176
64% 113 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 454
50% 393 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1A4E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6109
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.2% Poor
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 43.8
Parallax 31.3
30% 37.5 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 26.8
27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1382 882 833 847 981 969 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,209
Write 1,887
Mixed 1,639
SusWrite 982
324% 1,429 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 46.8
156% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 607
DQ Write 446
DQ Mixed 543
401% 532 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 180%
Great: 347%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
798GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 103 102 104 106 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 76.6
Write 82.8
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 101
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 029E CMSX16GX4M1A2666C18 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.4% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 13.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 14.9
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GE_FX505GE Builds (Compare 715 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GE_FX505GE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback