Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 605e 279 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Memory 49.1 1-Core 33.5 2-Core 66 31% 49.5 Pts	4-Core 132 8-Core 134 18% 133 Pts	64-Core 132 8% 132 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300 14,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% PwrHis(1787 2271) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.89% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 1.3 1% 1.37 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.2 1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.89% Great: 1%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GB 8,741 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6103006 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 149 Mixed 1.7 16% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.5 26% 6.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 90%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB 66,048 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 457GB free Firmware: GR2O Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 99.9 Write 50.3 Mixed 39.9 47% 63.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	25% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 9.9 26% 8.97 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.17 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GTS 250NvidiaBench 7%, 14,881 samples	4x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	2x
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	2x

SSD
SUV400S3712 120GBKingstonBench 34%, 503 samples	2x
GP-GSTFS312 240GBGigabyteBench 32%, 119 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16