PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
System | Gigabyte H110M-Gaming 3 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H110M-Gaming3-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170725 |
Uptime | 4.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 20 '21 at 18:29 |
Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 70% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
56%
Above average
|
54% 80.1 Pts
|
28% 222 Pts
|
18% 276 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.7%
Poor
|
29% 37.6 fps
|
31% 34.3 fps
|
|
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$40
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 82 68 91 102 115 MB/s
|
69.8%
Good
|
83% 113 MB/s
|
124% 0.9 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FHP 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
37.5%
Below average
|
36% 12.7 GB/s
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
51% 78.5 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $189Bench 72%, 187,839 samples | 96x |
Core i3-7100Intel $130Bench 66%, 63,199 samples | 57x |
Pentium G4560Intel $65Bench 62%, 57,906 samples | 48x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 740,998 samples | 82x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $128Bench 27%, 223,916 samples | 46x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,090,662 samples | 40x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $376 |