Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 5 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemSamsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121106
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateJun 03 '17 at 10:08
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-2430M-$106
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
33.6% Below average
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 108
42% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 156
21% 155 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B3) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 10.17.10.4229
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.2% Terrible
Lighting 25
Reflection 21.6
Parallax 20.7
7% 22.4 fps
MRender 17.6
Gravity 17.5
Splatting 18.8
5% 18 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 5.2%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 512GB-$448
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 479
Write 421
Mixed 402
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 28.3
99% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 111
111% 182 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 110%
Sandisk iSSD P4 8GB
7GB free
Firmware: SSD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 120
Write 26.6
Mixed 40.6
14% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.66
4K Write 6.53
4K Mixed 3.42
20% 5.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 15%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$100
39GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 75.6
Write 80.8
Mixed 80.8
60% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.22
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Micron 16JTF51264HZ-1G4M1 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.4
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B Builds (Compare 513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback