Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-240 462 User benchmarks, average bench 24% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	39.8% Below average	Memory 77.4 1-Core 18.2 2-Core 17.8 32% 37.8 Pts	4-Core 18.2 8-Core 17.5 2% 17.9 Pts	64-Core 18 1% 18 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6250 Graphics 23 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 109A) 384MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.930.13.1100 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	1.16% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.8 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 1 Splatting 0.7 1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 1.16% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 210GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 119 158 150 125 54 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.8% Below average	Read 196 Write 197 Mixed 177 SusWrite 128 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 11.4 42% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 76.9 DQ Write 66.1 DQ Mixed 36.7 37% 59.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SSZ3128M8-EDJEF DDR3 1333 4G 6GB 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.36% Terrible	MC Read 2 MC Write 1.4 MC Mixed 2.2 5% 1.87 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 0.9 SC Mixed 1.3 4% 1.37 GB/s	Latency 85.6 47% 85.6 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

RAM
M2S4G64CB8HG5N-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 26%, 640 samples	1x
M2S4G64CB8HG4N-DI 1x4GBNanyaBench 29%, 152 samples	1x
M471B5673EH1-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 2,358 samples	1x

Value: 5% - Terrible

Total price: $59

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16