Asus F50SL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive18% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemAsus F50SL  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON F50SL
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090119
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 19 '21 at 21:50
Run Duration352 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core2 Duo T6400-$99
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 49.1
1-Core 28.5
2-Core 65.5
31% 47.7 Pts
4-Core 67.5
8-Core 67.2
9% 67.3 Pts
64-Core 68.2
5% 68.2 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 41%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$25
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 93 88 84 39 77 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18% Very poor
Read 60.3
Write 73.1
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 75.8
15% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 8.9
34% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 9.1
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 11
9% 11.9 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 18%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB-$50
25GB free
Firmware: FBEOC40C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 55 53 53 52 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 51
Write 50
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 53.2
33% 44.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.83% Terrible
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.87 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.83%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical F50SL Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus F50SL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 14% - Very poor Total price: $100
The Best.
Intel Core i5-10600K $224Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-10400F $148Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $315Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback