MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '21 at 15:56
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 74.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 1,174
104% 882 Pts
64-Core 2227
138% 2227 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 192
Reflection 290
Parallax 211
156% 231 fps
MRender 287
Gravity 214
Splatting 160
173% 220 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 150%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 950 663 669 672 666 667 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2441
Write 2,267
Mixed 1,722
SusWrite 714
399% 1,786 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 87.6
294% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,385
DQ Write 1,206
DQ Mixed 1,271
959% 1,287 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 290%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
78GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2401
Write 1,858
Mixed 1,732
443% 1,997 MB/s
4K Read 66.4
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 91.7
306% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,426
DQ Write 1290
DQ Mixed 1,345
1,013% 1,354 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
329GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 357 358 368 367 366 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 364
Write 367
Mixed 353
SusWrite 363
82% 362 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 51.8
167% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 218
163% 217 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 133%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$71
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 163 161 164 165 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 165
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 164
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 113%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 127 132 131 130 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 105
Write 128
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 130
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.6
177% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 31
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 30.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $910
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback