Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 19 '21 at 15:27
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$783
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 76.5
1-Core 129
2-Core 257
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 1,034
95% 773 Pts
64-Core 2,162
145% 2,162 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$400
ASRock(1849 5125) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 144
Parallax 189
106% 155 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 134
Splatting 95.7
106% 115 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$68
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B1T3NA Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 885 532 549 541 554 554 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 2,707
Write 1,915
Mixed 1,639
SusWrite 603
381% 1,716 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 85.8
290% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,017
DQ Write 950
DQ Mixed 587
550% 852 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 279%
Great: 305%
Toshiba HDWD240 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: KQ000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 101 106 117 97 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 110
Write 98.1
Mixed 42.9
SusWrite 107
20% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.5
5% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 20%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$115
931GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 419 409 398 382 368 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 449
Mixed 425
SusWrite 400
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 57.7
189% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Kingston A400 480GB-$55
433GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 251 249 252 250 246 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 418
Write 394
Mixed 339
SusWrite 259
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 40.1
138% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 160
123% 166 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 102%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$132
340GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8.9 12 16 20 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 58%
Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE630 2TB
71GB free
Firmware: MZ4OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 28 17 26 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.84% Terrible
Read 1.2
Write 26.7
Mixed 5
SusWrite 22.5
10% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
27% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 6.84%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
859GB free
Firmware: ML6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 43 41 57 31 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
23% Poor
Read 35.5
Write 14.9
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 44.8
21% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 23%
Great: 75%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 3TB
224GB free, PID 50a0
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 81 81 83 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 79.4
Write 80.8
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 81.5
103% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 62%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB
132GB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 0 12 10 0 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 39.6
Write 40.4
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 12.3
40% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 39.2
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 36.3
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 109%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 22,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,132
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback