| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-MX R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120629 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 19 '21 at 12:07 |
| Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
74.7%
Very good
|
74% 127 Pts
|
48% 352 Pts
|
20% 323 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.3%
Above average
|
57% 70.7 fps
|
55% 67.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
30% 134 MB/s
|
74% 23.7 MB/s
|
21% 28.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 M378B1G73EB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
|
33.5%
Below average
|
31% 10.7 GB/s
|
31% 10.7 GB/s
|
57% 69.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H61-MX R2.0 Builds (Compare 732 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-MX R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 109x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 108x |
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 54x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 65x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 54x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 33x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |