| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO P1510 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | MICRO-STAR D2415 |
| Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20101101 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 19 '21 at 11:41 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.7%
Good
|
68% 112 Pts
|
37% 298 Pts
|
23% 366 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
PNY(196E 11C3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.65
|
32.1%
Below average
|
34% 43.3 fps
|
29% 36.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
31.9%
Below average
|
21% 93.5 MB/s
|
59% 22.5 MB/s
|
79% 109 MB/s
|
|
|
59.9%
Above average
|
74% 100 MB/s
|
224% 1.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM SDRAM 1666 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.4%
Poor
|
21% 7.27 GB/s
|
27% 9.3 GB/s
|
61% 65.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical ESPRIMO P1510 Builds (Compare 39 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P1510
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 8x |
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 7x |
| Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples | 5x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
| GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 3x |
| GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $157 |