Gigabyte GA-EP43-DS3L

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EP43-DS3L  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080922
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJan 19 '21 at 05:46
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 73.6
1-Core 38.1
2-Core 76
42% 62.6 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 122
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Zotac(19DA 288B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 18.5
15% 17.9 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 19.1
Splatting 0.1
10% 14.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 33 9.5 11 14 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 84.1
Write 86.4
Mixed 61.4
SusWrite 25.8
48% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
183GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 104 106 108 106 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 100
Write 85.6
Mixed 49
SusWrite 107
62% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
146% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
991GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 33
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 18.6
39% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 19%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB
515GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 19 19 18 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.1% Very poor
Read 37.1
Write 34.1
Mixed 31
SusWrite 18.6
40% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 15%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
6GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.2 3.9 3.6 4.1 3.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Read 16.1
Write 0.7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.4
5% 5.68 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 7%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
31GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 19 18 17 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 19.9
Mixed 22
SusWrite 17.5
29% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
70% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
20.7% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EP43-DS3L Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP43-DS3L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $168
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback