Intel S3420GPV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardIntel S3420GPV  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100929
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 19 '21 at 02:53
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Xeon X3430
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 124
60% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 234
32% 237 Pts
64-Core 240
16% 240 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
0.43% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.43%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 256GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM02D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 180 195 173 193 193 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.7% Average
Read 197
Write 187
Mixed 136
SusWrite 186
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 25.3
88% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 31.3
DQ Write 65.6
DQ Mixed 35.9
31% 44.3 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.8% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 14.9
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.4
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical S3420GPV Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel S3420GPV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $224Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-10400F $148Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $315Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback