Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3397
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121029
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '21 at 00:23
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 85.3 1-Core 97.4 2-Core 193 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 330 46% 340 Pts	64-Core 342 21% 342 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.5% Poor	Lighting 37.4 Reflection 39.6 Parallax 38.6 30% 38.5 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 38.6 Splatting 27.3 28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160 11,290 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 120 97 117 135 118 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.1% Average	Read 226 Write 217 Mixed 205 SusWrite 118 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 25.4 83% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 87.5 DQ Mixed 50.4 59% 103 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 95%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 114GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 133 133 141 147 134 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 382 Write 160 Mixed 200 SusWrite 135 48% 220 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 16.7 4K Mixed 17.2 67% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 84.6 DQ Write 45.2 DQ Mixed 58 45% 62.6 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 85%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 8,520 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 4GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 14 15 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 25.6 Write 1.7 Mixed 17.1 SusWrite 13 17% 14.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.3 115% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF 4x4GB 210 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.6% Above average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.4 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 16.2 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1,921x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	725x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	488x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	64x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	56x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	52x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16