PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Gateway DX4860 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Gateway IPISB-VR |
Memory | 7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20111031 |
Uptime | 1.3 Days |
Run Date | Jan 18 '21 at 22:34 |
Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.4%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Zotac(19DA 9454) 2GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 448 446 459 458 459 MB/s
|
80.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-14900CL9-4GBSR Unifosa HU564403EP0200 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
43.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples | 175x |
Core i7-2600Intel $196Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 140x |
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 86x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 156x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 38x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 26x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $193 |