Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1620-$45 2,566 User benchmarks, average bench 49% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Memory 15.9 1-Core 64.5 2-Core 86.2 30% 55.5 Pts	4-Core 97.1 8-Core 106 13% 102 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Asus R5 230 508 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 3027) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1046.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.73% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 2.1 2% 2.3 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 2 Splatting 2 2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.73% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 327GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 98 90 119 127 123 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 135 Write 107 Mixed 34.1 SusWrite 111 70% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF 1x8GB 496 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 5.5 16% 5.53 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 5.2 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 353 11% 353 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	117x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	51x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	32x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	10x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $178

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16