Monster TULPAR T7 V20.1

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	66.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T7 V20.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.1
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190716
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '21 at 22:09
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Memory 91.7 1-Core 133 2-Core 259 90% 161 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 798 80% 649 Pts	64-Core 951 59% 951 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1D05 1065) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 9.7 Parallax 8.2 5% 8 fps	MRender 11.4 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 11 8% 9.63 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Device(1D05 1065) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	66.7% Good	Lighting 82.5 Reflection 93.8 Parallax 78.5 67% 84.9 fps	MRender 93.5 Gravity 79.2 Splatting 72.1 66% 81.6 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 404GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1672 825 604 602 587 596 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	267% Outstanding	Read 2,224 Write 1,334 Mixed 992 SusWrite 814 297% 1,341 MB/s	4K Read 58.3 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 77.8 253% 86.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,215 DQ Write 996 DQ Mixed 1,080 816% 1097 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 267% Great: 296%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 733GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 146 154 155 165 151 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 82.5 Write 127 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 153 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.3 121% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	83% Excellent	MC Read 32.4 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 22.7 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 35.4 SC Mixed 26.5 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.1 Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 46%

Yacht

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.1

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	138x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	82x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	56x

SSD
760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $33Bench 190%, 20,095 samples	29x
MZVLB256HBHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 199%, 3,806 samples	16x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	8x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	50x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	48x
F4 DDR4 2666 C19 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 77%, 1,403 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $33

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16