Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	65.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	4.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '21 at 19:23
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	Memory 92.6 1-Core 143 2-Core 285 96% 173 Pts	4-Core 563 8-Core 1,085 98% 824 Pts	64-Core 1142 71% 1142 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% MSI(1462 3750) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	65.7% Good	Lighting 82.2 Reflection 114 Parallax 76 67% 90.6 fps	MRender 85.8 Gravity 80.1 Splatting 68.9 63% 78.3 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NFS011SA324-6007000 240GB 514 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1230A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 508 Write 405 Mixed 387 96% 433 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 32.2 152% 59.7 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 48.2 89% 170 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 98%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 66GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 118 118 119 118 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Read 159 Write 161 Mixed 95.5 SusWrite 117 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 2x8GB 24,552 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	MC Read 32.6 MC Write 33.2 MC Mixed 23.3 85% 29.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 25.5 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	1,612x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,215x
Core i7-9700KIntel $249Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	177x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	829x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	480x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	428x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	295x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	217x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	142x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	360x
D12.2356WS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 81%, 464 samples	171x
D12.2324CS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 80%, 469 samples	162x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $438

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16