Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Memory 74.3 1-Core 54.5 2-Core 122 51% 83.8 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 229 30% 226 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240 11,020 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 8335) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	3.54% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.9 4% 3.17 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 0.3 2% 3.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.54% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 56 47 44 70 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 95.8 Write 86.7 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 54.3 52% 70.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	36.1% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 11.1 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 10.6 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 91.9 44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	109x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	85x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	66x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	17x
M378B5773CH0-CK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 50%, 789 samples	8x
M378B5773CH0-CK0 4x2GBSamsungBench 57%, 306 samples	7x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16